At this point it is worth recalling that the recent oil shock is fundamentally different, compared to the oil shocks of the 1970s. Back then the order of events was as follows:

1. Strong demand
2. OPEC cut supply
3. Price spike
4. Inflation and recession

And the situation now:

1. Strong demand
2. Price spike
3. Inflation and recession
4. OPEC cut supply

It is also worth recalling that with the passage of every year, the share of global production and oil exports is swinging towards the OPEC countries. If Russia and Brazil, who are both in talks with OPEC over collaboration on oil prices, are included, then the exporting countries are in a very strong position indeed.

OPEC and non-OPEC liquids exports. Both charts from Rembrandt Koppelaar's November Oil Watch Monthly.

And so here is the not so very radical proposal. If OPEC ± Russia and Brazil want $75 / bbl, then they should consider setting this as a minimum price (adjusted for local variations in crude oil quality). The market would then adjust the call on OPEC crude at that price. OPEC quotas would then have to be set on a % pro-rata basis instead of the current production allocation. And OPEC would be free to adjust the minimum price at any point in the future, although if the price exceeds the set minimum it will mean that the world is once again pumping at maximum capacity.

The risk to OPEC would be that the World cannot afford $75 / bbl, and consumption will continue to fall, thus eroding their market share.

OECD governments may dislike the thought of such a market intervention, but would need reminding that the freedom of our markets is already severely compromised and that a prolonged period of low oil price may jeopardise future supplies and undermine moves to alternative forms of energy.

Food for thought.