The oil companies are of course to be applauded for their enterprise and tenacity for maximising recovery from the North Sea. However, in presentations like this the optimistic out look masks the dreadful and detereorating state of the UK energy balance with imports of oil, natural gas and coal growing year on year, destroying our trade balance.

Apache's endeavors on Forties are to be applauded but this must be placed in context. The field revival is that little bump in the tail end of Forties production in 2004/5.

Talisman too have done a great job of nurturing mature assets through their twilight years. It is worth mentioning though that Dr James Buckee, former CEO of Talisman is a patron of the Peak Oil movement and is about as gloomy as they come for the outlook of global oil production.

The UK North Sea has produced about 25 billion barrels of oil. A Hubbert Linearisation decline analysis suggests that the UK may ultimately produce between 28 and 30 billion barrels, so with 25 billion already gone that leaves 3 to 5 billion in remaining reserves. The BP statistical review (published 2007 with figures for 2006) quotes 3.9 billion barrels of reserves for the UK.

To suggest that the UK may produce as much oil in the next 40 years as it has done in the last 30 years is irresponsible pipe dreaming. All our biggest and best fields are near empty and are lining up to be decommissioned. Our politicians need to face this grim reality and then act accordingly to ensure that the UK can provide for its future energy needs. This will involve truly massive expansion of alternative energy sources and legislating for energy efficiency in transportation and power generation.

go on Euan!

I think some simplistic approach like "what time is it when there is as much left as you have used" bartlett style is called for

the impression from the BBC website site is muddled thinking.

it will be hard to get the average viewer to understand that decreasing the depletion rate with increased effort means an inevitable increased inflexion and increased depletion rate... falling off a cliff

perhaps others have ideas on conveying this more now=less later idea

good luck

Boris
London

suggest that the UK may produce as much oil in the next 40 years as it has done in the last 30 years is irresponsible pipe dream

You could argue, if put to you that even if your wrong and this estimate is correct the profile of production will not follow a flat plateau or rise until all the oil is gone.

aside from being irresponsible even if correct they basically admit to peak!

it makes no difference

Boris
London

Oil industry metaphors used in newspaper headlines that set my teeth on edge...

  • Pipe Dream
  • Oil's Well At company name
  • Slick as a synonym for clever or even just good
  • Profits Gush At company name
  • Any others?

    Not oil industry, but...

    'With the onrushing food crunch, investors are ploughing into agricultural commodities.'

    ...is a little nauseating... and seems to be 'cropping up' quite frequently ;)

    My jaw dropped in disbelief as I heard this discussed on Radio 4 this morning.

    A quick back-of the envelope calculation reveals that the extra 30 billion barrels they're talking about is equivalent to around one year's global oil consumption.

    It's too much to ask reporters these days to do simple arithmetic.

    Or even to consider multiple factors at the same time.

    There was NO mention at all in that "news" report this morning of climate change and the need to drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption.

    The BBC is making a habit of this, decoupling oil from climate change at every opportunity.

    Phantom oil is very low in carbon emissions, I believe.
    The real stuff is different.