"poopyhead" is your term, not mine; you missed the point completely, as I did not critique his content, merely his style. The 'salt' you refer to is more like dung to the rest of us, so don't be surprised when we spit it back out.

And frankly I'm in favor of nuclear being part of the overall energy mix, as well as significantly higher percentages of renewables and substantive demand management and, above all, conservation; cooler heads will go farther in this discussion.

So he's right. You have not a single argument against the article, except how easy it is to read.

It baffles me how anyone would admit in a conversation he has no points to contribute, and somehow find pride in this ?

Welcome to the real world. Here "reality bites" and style is optional. I'm not entirely sure you'll like it here.

tomc has been here all of 1 week and three days, and professing, "Global warming is a fantasy". His version of reality must always be the right one, we must assume...