![]() | The limit of the statistic R/P in models of oil discovery and production | The Oil Drum: Europe | Coal Crunch? | ![]() |
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
Great post Ugo,
Your post got me wondering at what concentration of uranium would the energy from the uranium no longer repay the energy used to extract and process it. Obviously in concentrations it is found in seawater the energy used to extract it would far outweigh the energy from the extracted uranium but since it is an extremely energy dense element i was wondering if anyone could give me a simplistic ballpark figure to satisfy my curiosity. (1%, 0.1%, 000000000.1%etc).
Pulverizing hard rock has an energy cost near 50 kWh per tonne if it is to fit 80 percent through 25-micron holes; half as much if the holes are 100-micron. Uranium yields 54 kWh of electricity per gram in the CANDU reactors nearest me, so if only 1.08 grams per tonne can be extracted, it might all go to power the crusher. Average rock is 2.2 to 2.8 grams per tonne, so it probably can yield a little net energy in this case. There is about as much CANDU-accessible fission energy in the average underfoot rock as there is tar combustion energy in the Alberta tarsands, and that energy is two-thirds net or more.
Seawater extraction of uranium definitely yields a very high net energy fraction, because nothing laborious need be done to the water; it could be considered pre-crushed. The uranium price at which this was expected to pay in 2001 was briefly surpassed recently, but now prices have settled back down. The rate of discovery of very cheap uranium in Australia in 2007 was nearly equal, in thermal terms, to the whole world's rate of petroleum burning.
How shall the car gain nuclear cachet
Physicist Michael Dittmar showed this in his ASPO VII presentation (slide 12):
With desalination becoming more common in some parts of the world I have wondered wether mineral extract from sea water could piggy back on this?
As the minerals are concentrated in the brine from desal plants would it not be more viable to attempt extraction from this water?
I think you'd have to consider details of the desalination method. My impression is that most desalination plants don't produce a very concentrated brine. You might have more luck recovering metals from evaporation ponds, such as those used for sea salt production for thousands of years.
Lets ignore seawater for a little bit; The energy cost of the rossing mine in nambia is 1/500th the energy returned in light water reactors from the uranium mined, and the ore grade is 300ppm.
Then consider that breeder reactor regimes are 200 times as fuel efficient than light water reactors.
The energy from mining uranium will never be a showstopper in nuclear power production.