Speaking of nuclear:

British Energy shares slide on output concerns

Shares in British Energy dived 8 per cent yesterday as problems at two of its nuclear power stations threatened to slash output a year after boiler cracks forced two of its other plants to close all winter.

British Energy shares led the FTSE 100 index down after the UK's biggest power generator said it had shut two more reactors after finding an "issue related to a wire winding" in the boiler closure unit at its Hartlepool-1 plant.

The weekend closures left almost half of British Energy's nuclear reactors offline yesterday morning and revived memories of its Hinkley Point and Hunterston nuclear power stations being closed throughout last winter.

Brown should pray for a warm winter...

Speaking of market mechanisms: an Op-Ed in yesterday's FT:

Energy liberalisation leads to higher prices

(...) what is liberalisation expected to achieve? A more competitive and transparent market and thereby lower prices is the stock reply. A possible relationship between liberalised markets and security of supply has been a more recent emphasis.

Such aspirations could be dismissed on the grounds that the gas and electricity industries are inherently unsuitable industries for competition. Here, though, I would like to challenge them by drawing attention to the impact of liberalisation on the three main cost components that make up the prices paid by households (...) the wholesale cost of gas and electricity, the cost of transmission and distribution and the cost of supply (billing and marketing).

(...)

First, as should be anticipated, liberalisation increases aggregate supply costs for domestic customers (increased marketing costs, duplicated billing infrastructure, switching costs etc). Second, the level of these costs can be unrelated to the actual cost of supply as energy companies defend or increase their downstream profit margins. Third, while supply costs for gas and electricity should not be too different (the billing process is the same), in 2006 they were only £16 for gas, but jumped to £88 for electricity - providing a clear indication that a squeeze on gas supply margins brought about by the rising wholesale cost of UK gas was compensated for at the expense of electricity customers.

Full liberalisation in electricity and gas has either not got off the ground or has died a death elsewhere in the world. Through its impact on wholesale pricing and on supply costs and margins it is likely to result in both higher and more arbitrary prices, as well as making a lottery of investment incentives. But the European Commission presses on regardless at the expense of addressing more urgent energy problems. Somewhat ironically, its efforts are mainly sustained by the UK.

On wholesale markets, the author has this to add:

The impact of liberalisation on wholesale costs is problematic in that short-term markets increasingly price electricity or gas delivered under long-term contracts. Such indexation to short-term markets (for example to month-ahead or day-ahead prices) is wrongly seen as a virtuous indicator of liberalisation, when in fact these markets establish a volatile flexibility premium as buyers and sellers seek to balance their positions when delivery day approaches and options increasingly diminish.
To counterpose them with "old-fashioned" long-term contracts and allow them to set a price for baseload supplies contracted for perhaps years in advance of a delivery day is therefore misplaced - such long-term supplies are more appropriately indexed to a wider basket of commodities, including alternative fuels, in order to reflect the different risk profile they offer. This is not a trivial matter: gas indexation has ruined otherwise viable businesses in the UK and made long-term investment decisions hazardous.

(Note - investment banks and traders love volatility - it's a great source of profits for them. In essence, deregulation has forced utilities to outsource volatility management - with the added twist that they pay more for it than before...)

Can Gordon Brown be as ignorant of the world oil supply situation as he appears to be, or has it been agreed at the highest level of OECD governments to play dumb, in the hope (or expectation?) that the markets will send a sufficently strong (but not catastrophic) signal that a wave of just-in-time innovation and investment acheives a relatively smooth transition to alternative energy ?

I suspect that the powers-that-be may think they are being rather clever in NOT taking any mitigation steps.
"Look, no hands !" they seem to saying.
Such people no doubt view the typical TOD-er is a naiv babe in arms who has no grasp of the wonders of modern economics.

Gordon Brown has close family connections to the nuclear industry. His younger brother Andrew Brown works for EDF Energy, the UK subsidiary of EDF, which operates nuclear power stations in France, and which is one of the leading companies pushing for a nuclear rebuild programme in the UK. Andrew Brown was appointed as EDF Energy's Head of Press on 13 September 2004. Previously, he worked for the lobbying company Weber Shandwick

http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/Gordon_Brown

Gordon Brown has the soul of an accountant.

They, and their self-important kin, the economists, really do believe that because they put a number in a spreadsheet things magically appear. They've never had to deal with reality, instead they deal with man-made numbers - usually trying to play tricks to make the numbers dance to their liking. The real world is immune to their charms, and like the spurned suitor they react badly by trying to block it out.

All the while he is in charge we will have substantial attempts to maintain the status quo on all fronts. Nothing new will happen that doesn't lead to a new tax.

I once had two job interviews in one day. The first, the shortest interview I've ever had, was for a maths programmer in nuclear fusion research. I couldn't answer the first question. Great place to visit, very friendly. Lunch was a sandwich at your computer desk sitting in a very tatty chair. We were surrounded by millions if not billions of $ worth of experimental kit.
The second interview was with an insurance company. Full hospitality suite with free booze, everyone in suits, lots of group sessions to see who would fit with the corporate personality profile. Later we were shown the office we would be working in. After two years we would be given a plusher chair and sit next to somebody vaguely important...

I tried to explain in my interiew that the difference between science and economics, was that one tried to fit the rules to reality, and the other tried to fit reality to the rules. I didn't get that job either.

A true scientist must love truth.

Economist is better off loving power (and proxies of it, like money).

This is another fundamental difference.

To go into economics is to love power and to yield power, and truth can always be bent.

To go into pure science (again), is to have very little or specific domain limited power, but to truly understand how things work.

No wonder the two don't mix so well :)

On Financial Times Website now:

I think it will disappear behind a paywall soon

Efforts to build a new generation of nuclear power plants are under threat from staff shortages, Whitehall disputes over investment in renewables and how to deal with nuclear waste, according to leaked documents from the government department overseeing the programme.

The problems could mean “any nuclear programme would have to be put on hold from April 2008” – the government’s planned start date – according to documents seen by the Financial Times. The documents form a “script” that John Hutton, business secretary, will present to Gordon Brown.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/26dd1cc0-81a1-11dc-9b6f-0000779fd2ac.html?ncli...

Carbon -Coventry UK

The US isn't the only nation that has failed to educate its youth in the skills that will be in great demand in the future. Nice to know that the EU also suffers from globalization. It still amazes me how the things we could do in the 1960s and 70s is beyond our reach today.