Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
Sounds like the case of a paper being due and him pulling something together the night before. :)
You do realise that only 'important' papers would by written by the CSA. I doubt this would have qualified. It reads to me like the work of a bag carrier pulling together some existing data to answer a posed question. CSA probably read over it, but wouldn't have given the matter any thought.
If you want to reply to him, I'd suggest:
a) don't tell him he's an idiot. Point out 'factual inaccuracies in the report' and 'inconsistent policy statements' - it gets much more notice.
b) see if you can find a route direct, not via his front office. Otherwise probably the first person to see it will be the person who wrote the document, and he won't pass it on.
c) emphasise how efforts to mitigate the risk of peak oil are 'compatible and supportive' of efforts to reduce climate change. From a reading of this political capital has been staked in supporting Brown in pushing a climate change agenda, and he doesn't want anything confusing it. To get him onside, it has to support his main policy aim.