98 comments on CO2 Capture and Storage: The Energy Costs
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
- ASPO The official site of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas.
- Energy Bulletin Clearing house for news regarding the peak in global energy supply.
- PowerSwitch Dedicated to raising awareness & discussion of the impending & permanent decline of cheap oil & gas supply.
- ODAC Oil Depletion Analysis Centre working to raise awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil-depletion problem.
- Global Public Media Public service broadcasting for a post carbon world.
- Post Carbon Institute Learning to live in a low energy world.
- PeakOil.com US site and forum to educate and promote awareness of global hydrocarbon depletion.
- FEASTA The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability
- Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) This website describes an effective and fair response both to climate change and oil/gas depletion
Other Blogs
User login
Personnel
Editors
Contributors
Peak Oil Primers
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Vital Trivia
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
The mass of co2 injected can be quite high.
however using sublimation of co2 is retarded. the work one can extract from exanding gasses, which draw in heat is near nothing. it is for sure an energy losing process.
co2 is a "dead" molecule, no more energy can be extracted from it.
sheesh.
/thanks for the laugh tho. storing energy as sublimated co2.
//and what about the heavier than air vapours?
///everyone following such a vehicle would probably hyperventalate and pass out, maybe die if the conc. gets high enough
Hi - Gilgamesh , you say:
(I know what U mean ... BUT)
CO2 - is the most important thing actually ... and I therefor disagree 111%
for one -CO2 is "food" for all the green suff around , included algae .. hocus-pocus- there we have meat and fish
-secondly - the byproduct from the photosynthesis in "our dear" oxygen
CO2 is not dead at all - "what is dead though, are the braincells inside the US governmentals heads - or maybe they are throughoutly boneheads over there (?)", I dont know really.
=> this message hereinafter is mentally beamed to the US Senate - and not for TODers, because U are among us nice thinkers :)
I must say quite frankly- that I am very fed up and provocated over the US attitude on climate - and also over the idea of not embedding politics concerning peak-oil and beyond (today)
Remember- you 4% of world population grab and burn 25% of the oil- goods and U flash wars over it and threatens all over the place - it really scares me , and it should also scare the am_voters!
Let history be history - the overwhelming content in the IPCC-report is only understood,acknowledged and "approved" recently by most UN countries -
BUT the US...Australia and a few other "bad" parties does not comply - WHAT do you say ... ? .... You will find YOUR OWN SOULUTIONS ... HAAhhhh? I bet you will, as YOU roll out new SUVs and take the "bio-hal-lelujahs"...and the more "cartoonish hydrogen-hal-lelujah "...
Can americans be re-programmed to skip the idea of car ?
( or at f**** least go fore small tiny-cars. Fro starters..)